It somehow feels "wrong" to say that it has been fascinating to watch the unfolding of the drama of hurricane Katrina. The devastation is truly beyond our ability to comprehend and it seems like we will be dealing with the aftermath of the destruction on so many levels for so long that it will probably come to be known as the time before and after Katrina (much in the same way we discuss pre- and post-September 11).
Even so, as I have watched and read and reflected, I have been amazed at the way we so quickly moved into the blame game. There is no question that there is enough of it to go around and still have some left over. People and institutions from the local to the federal level charged with the responsibility of anticipating and responding to such possible scenarios dropped the ball on so many levels that it is going to take a significant amount of time to untangle it, likely assign blame for it, but hopefully (and finally) learn something from it.
I think the blame thing is a bit premature, though. Accountability is necessary, to be sure, and like I said post-disaster analysis will trace all the different junctures where systems broke-down. But what I have noticed as surprisingly absent is any sense of the staggering complexity of this disaster and how many different things were in play that ultimately led to this outcome. It is a complex situation. Complexity theory and complex system dynamics are something that pique my interest pretty regulary. And as I watched this complex drama enacted in front of me, I remember a book I read four or five years ago dealing with this subject.
The book is called The Logic of Failure by Dietrich Dorner. Originally published in Germany in 1989, it was reprinted in the United States in English in 1986. Here's a quote from the introduction of the book.
Failure does not strike like a bolt from the blue; it develops gradually according to its own logic. As we watch individuals attempt to solve problems, we will see that complicated situations seem to elicit habits of thought that set failure in motion from the beginning. From that point, the continuing complexity of the task and the growing apprehension of failure encourage methods of decision making that make failure even more likely and then inevitable. We can learn, however. People court failure in predictable ways.
He then goes on to demonstrate that failure has a consistent logic to it. Using examples like the nuclear disaster in Chernobyl and famine scenarios in sub-Saharan Africa, Dorner builds a fascinating argument about how failure progresses logically until it becomes inevitable. He goes on to say that these (and other) situations have much in common when we look beyond the peculiarities of each. The interrelated variables are:
- Complexity: The existence of many interdependent variables in a given situation. The more variables and the greater their interdependence, the greater that system's complexity.
- Intransparence: One cannot see everything one would like to see. Leaders must make decisions affecting a system whose momentary features they can see only partially, unclearly, in blurred and shadowy outline - or possibly not at all.
- Internal Dynamics: All situations develop independent of external control, according to their own internal dynamic. They move on their own, whether the players take that movement into account or not. Reality is not passive but - to some degree - active. This fact creates time pressure.
- Incomplete or Incorrect Understanding of the System: People attempt to solve problems in these systems without fully understanding the systems; indeed, they make false assumptions. If we want to operate within a complex and dynamic system, we have to know not only what its current status is but what its status will be or could be in the future, and we have to know how certain actions we take will influence the situation.
Anyway, that is just a sample of the fascinating science and research behind complex system analysis and a simple cursory reading of what I shared here. It also helps to understand some of the dynamics that have been in play in the days both leading up to and following hurricane Katrina. Unfortunately (if understatement is permitted), such failure has dramatic impact as we have seen in Chernobyl and now the gulf coast.
Recent Comments