The new issue of First Things came last week. They have the unique design sensibility: to list the table of contents as the cover of the journal. I like that because I can immediately know what I want to read. This most recent issue claimed an article that grabbed my attention right off: St. Benedict After September 11, by John Owens.
As I was reading the article I sunk deeper and deeper into Owen's reflections. In the article he talks about the relation of the believer and the church to the state and how they interact and the complications that ensue whichever path is chosen. Historically, he states that at and after the time of Constantine believers faced the same decision, that is, how to engage (or disengage) with the state, noting that Benedict went the path of withdrawal and began what has survived him for fifteen centuries, namely monasticism.
Into this historical dialogue he discusses the increasing influence of twentieth century theologians Lesslie Newbigin, Stanley Hauerwas, and Wendell Berry (and while Newbigin and Berry might balk at the title of theologian, being first a missionary and a farmer, respectively, in my estimation they are first theologians who have applied their working theology to their specific vocations) and how these thinkers have stressed a sort of withdrawal: a movement away from the generalities and over-arching forms of both modernity and so-called Constantinian Christianity into the specific and localized foci of communities of belief and resistance. This is particularly challenging to me as one who has been discipled through the writings of Newbigin and Hauerwas and more recently (though less extensively) Berry, as well as the monastic order of Benedict.
Owen does a wonderful job, in this very brief essay, describing the tensions facing thoughtful followers of Christ who are struggling to understand how to engage and/or whether or not it is worth doing so. He does not offer any quick answers. I do find it interesting that Hauerwas is presented so sympathetically, given that prior to the war in Iraq he was a member of the editorial board of this journal but due to differences over the merit of the war, parted ways. Thanks to Owens and First Things for a nuanced and provocative essay.
Unfortunately, this offering isn't available online. I may try to scan it for downloading as a .pdf though. For a basic primer on Hauerwas, read this article in The National Catholic Reporter. Click here for an informative and concise biography of Newbigin, as well as an overview of his thought.
Recent Comments